My "issue" with Debbie started in 1996 when I found out that Michael Jackson got married for the second time. I was shocked and I was hoping that his new wife would be of color. Boy, was I completely wrong. Not only was she not of color, she was unattractive and very happy. I saw probably the most strangest, oddest and off putting wedding picture of all time. Michael looked very unhappy and trapped while Debbie was elated and knew that she hit the jackpot. I knew that Michael was making a huge mistake and I also knew that the marriage was not real and that Debbie was bad news.
As the years went by, information regarding their "marriage" and the aftermath started to surface. The "union" between Michael and Debbie went from supposed "friendship" to downright terrible. This blog post is not about bashing Debbie Rowe and making her out to be the bad person - that has already happened. This blog post is about telling Michael's side of the story and in turn, forces the reader to consider that Debbie was with Michael for her own benefit. The facts and information that will be posted on here are not created from the sky but from actual evidence. I am expecting backlash from this because most of Michael's fans will never accept the fact that Debbie was the ultimate opportunist and did everything in her power to get what she wanted from Michael. I will accept the backlash. The root to this blog is to tell the truth about Michael and not lie to anyone about him. I would defeat the purpose of this blog if I ignored what Debbie did to Michael so that majority of Michael's fans can accept what I do. If that was the case, this blog would not exist. Anyway, read on and hopefully, you will see the real Deborah Jean Rowe.
I am not familiar with Debbie's life before she met Michael so I had to do some research on her life before she hit the jackpot. Let's start with the fact that Debbie was born in December of 1958 to her parents, Gordon Rowe and Barbara Chilcutt in Spokane, Washington. When Debbie was 11 years old, her parents divorced and she moved to Southern California. Now, here is where it gets conflicted: Debbie was adopted as a teenager by millionaires Norman and Lisette Ackerberg, lived with the couple and enrolled into Hollywood High. Let's stop right there. I became confused by this and decided to do some more research and found out that Debbie supposedly being adopted seems to be a planted story. So, I do not believe that she was ever adopted. I do believe that when she was in school, she developed a crush on her science teacher, Richard Edelman and when she graduated from high school, she went right to work for Dr. Arnold Klein, as a medical assistant. Years later, in 1982, Debbie married her high school teacher, Richard, and converted to Judaism.
In 1988, according to a People magazine article on Debbie from 1996, she divorced Richard because -
"By the time their marriage fell apart in 1988, a major problem seemed to be money. In 1989, Rowe and Edelman filed for bankruptcy, with assets of less than $40,000 and debts of more than $73,000. "
In an article done by the tabloid, The Mirror, Richard stated about his divorce -
"It was a very bad split," he says. "She convinced me to give up teaching and begin a business which went bankrupt in 1989. The divorce left me feeling like a zombie."That is interesting. Keep that in mind when you read the sections on Michael and Debbie. How bad was the split up and why did the divorce left Richard feeling like a "zombie"? It is clear that if Debbie does not get what she wanted from certain people, those people were going to pay dearly. Richard did not get it as bad as Michael and when faced with money issues, instead of standing by her husband and dealing with the crisis together, Debbie divorces him. So, it looks like loyalty is not a quality of hers.
Michael and Debbie Saga Part 1
Before I get into Michael and Debbie's actual relationship with one another, I want to show you all what exactly is a medical assistant and what they are suppose to do. According to the Medical Board of California website, medical assistants,
"are unlicensed individuals who perform non-invasive routine technical support services under the supervision of a licensed physician and surgeon, podiatrist, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or nurse midwife in a medical office or clinic setting. The supervising physician and surgeon or podiatrist must be on the premises in order for the medical assistant to perform those non-invasive technical support services."http://www.mbc.ca.gov/Licensees/Physicians_and_Surgeons/Medical_Assistants/
When you read this blog post, keep that definition in mind and also read this very important piece of information -
Around the time period that Debbie was divorcing her first husband, she was working for Dr. Klein and "working" for Michael. I will be using Debbie's testimony in the Jacksons Vs. AEG Wrongful Death Civil Trial as the basis for part of this blog entry. I believe that her testimony is her actual response to the relationship that she had with Michael. I stated on this blog that Michael and Debbie were never a romantic couple. They were "friends" and then became enemies because of the repercussions of the divorce and custody situations.
According to her own testimony from the AEG trial, she started working for Dr. Klein in 1979 and met Michael in 1982. Michael would see Dr. Klein for his various skin aliments and his burn injury. They developed a closeness mainly because she saw Michael at his most vulnerable state. The way her friends would describe Debbie's personality, she was a "good hearted woman" and that is probably one of the reasons Michael could rely on her. However, he probably did not know that Debbie had her own agendas as to how to get Michael in her life.
We have to discuss the elephant in the room which is his issue with drugs. Michael, in my honest opinion, was not a drug addict but he was dependent on certain medications. Debbie had a lot of issues with Dr. Klein and according to her testimony during the AEG trial. You can read the transcript here:
She stated that Dr. Klein wanted all of his assistants to be called "nurses" even though they do not have a Bachelors in Nursing and are not RNs (registered nurses). Michael came to see Dr. Klein for his treatment with Acne and then started coming frequently, when he was diagnosed with Lupus and Vitiligo. As you read her testimony, Debbie stated that she was the least professional person that worked for Dr. Klein at that time and that was why she thinks Michael wanted to communicate with her. She stated that she would speak to Michael regularly on the phone while she was still working for Dr. Klein. Now, why would an employee from a doctor's office have the personal number of a client and continue to communicate with him outside of the office?
Debbie mentioned that she would inject/give Michael the pain medication Demerol because he had a very low tolerance to pain. This was done because Michael was getting Collagen injections for reasons that are unknown. That revelation got me thinking: can a medical assistant inject an opiate into a patient and if one can, why? I found out that a medical assistant can inject vaccines, B12, intradermal injections, medications, under a doctor's supervision. In her testimony, Debbie never mentioned that she was giving Michael Demerol with a doctor's supervision and it seems like she was doing this all on her own. It was also stated that Debbie was giving Michael collagen injections and as I am doing research about medical assistants, I saw this shocking find -
"Are medical assistants allowed to inject collagen?
No. The injection of collagen does not fall within the medical assistant's scope of practice. 16 CCR section 1366.4 states that medical assistants may inject "medications"."
In that same testimony, Debbie talks about the doctors that she claims were "competing" with one another in regards to Michael's health: Dr. Klein and Dr. Steven Hoefflman (Dr. Hoefflin was Michael's plastic surgeon who performed the scalp surgery.). Debbie would notice that these doctors would tell Michael about a drug that would relieved him of his pain and Michael would go to that doctor. Debbie, because she did not like what was going on, would accompany Michael, because she claimed that Michael wanted her to go with him, to see what was happening. Now, Debbie was supposed to be a medical assistant to Dr. Klein so why is she going with Michael to his appointments? She was not his personal doctor so there was no need for her to go. Why wasn't she sanctioned for what she was doing? When Debbie did not like what she saw, instead of reporting this to the Medical Board of California, she decides to inject herself into that mess and contact Michael's personal doctor, Dr. Alan Metzger with his help.
Dr. Metzger was Michael's doctor (main/internal doctor) but if Michael had an issues with both doctors, he should have went to Dr. Metzger and not Debbie. Debbie went out of her way to "help" Michael instead of reporting those two doctors to the medical board. When I did a blog post on the AEG trial, I stated that Debbie should have reported Dr. Klein to the medical board. So, let's revisit what was stated:
"Can I file a complaint without giving my name?
A complaint can be filed anonymously; however, the Board has a difficult time investigating these complaints. If the Board is unable to obtain documentation or evidence of the complaint allegations, the complaint may not be able to be pursued. The Board does accept complaints from individuals who wish to designate themselves as "confidential informants." A "code name" can be used which would allow investigative personnel to discuss the allegations with the "complainant" without disclosing the individual's name. But, again, if medical records are required, the patient's name will have to be disclosed to the physician."
Interesting. Now, what I am about to post is important because Debbie could have done this without giving out the name of the doctor.
"I have heard that Dr. X is prescribing large amounts of pain medication to people who are addicted to this medication. Will the Board investigate Dr. X?
This concern can be investigated by the Board. However, to investigate a physician's care/treatment, the Board needs information on a patient or patients. The Board can't assess the "quality" of care without focusing on a particular patient, as the Board has no authority to audit or review a physician's medical records without patient consent (or a subpoena which needs to be specific to a patient). If you have any information which you think would be helpful or if you know of any patients who are willing to cooperate with our investigation, please feel free to contact the Board at 800-633-2322 or file a complaint with the Board."
Also, Dr. Klein and Dr. Hoefflien would not know who reported them so Debbie would be free of being sanctioned or punished for making a complaint.
"Will the doctor know I have filed a complaint?
The "source" of the complaint information (the complainans) is confidential and is not disclosed by the Medical Board. However, if the complaint deals with your care and treatment, the Board's staff will request a copy of your medical records so the physician involved knows that a complaint has been filed regarding your treatment. He/she will not be told who filed the complaint."
"An estimated 20 percent of Americans have occasional sleep problems, with about one in 10 suffering from chronic insomnia. Balkrishnan acknowledges concerns that physicians might have about prescribing certain medications that can cause dependence, especially to patients with mental health disorders. Older sleep aids, a class of drugs called benzodiazepines, are muscle relaxants with addictive properties and high potential for abuse. However, since the early 1990s, a new class of drugs for insomnia called non-benzodiazepines has been on the market. They are effective sleep aids that don’t carry the risk of addiction, Balkrishnan said, and for that reason, patients should have ready access to these medications."http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/insomnia.htm
"Faye testified that nurse Debbie Rowe, who would later become Jackson's second wife and the mother of his two oldest children, would travel with them on the "Dangerous" tour in 1992 with "a little bag" of medications.http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/09/showbiz/jackson-death-trial/index.html
"Debbie Rowe asked me to learn how to give injections," she said. "I thought about it and said 'No.' I am not qualified to handle any kind of medications."
When the tour was on its way to Bangkok, Thailand, Faye was asked to carry a package she was told contained medicine patches for Jackson's pain, she testified. She refused to travel with it, she said.
Faye testified that the tour doctor, Dr. Stuart Finkelstein, later told her "I'm glad you weren't carrying it. It has vials and syringes. If you had brought this in, you might not be here." The implication was she could have been arrested for smuggling drugs."
Where do I begin? First off, let me state that I work at a doctor's office as a Front Desk Supervisor. I do all sorts of things at the doctor's office and I never had to do anything that I was not trained or educated to do. Karen Faye stated that Debbie would ask her if she would learn to give injections to Michael. Why the hell would a medical assistant ask a make up artist to inject her boss with medication when Debbie knows damn well Karen was not trained nor was she familiar with what was going on? First of all, she was not supposed to even be there; she was Dr. Klein's employee and not Michael's personal nurse. Michael had a doctor there when he needed him so why the hell would Debbie need to be there? Even if Michael wanted her there, still why on earth was she even on tour with him? The woman had no ounce of professionalism on her. Dr. Finkelstien was right when he told Karen that he was glad that she did not carry a bag full of syringes and vials. Of course, a doctor, who went to medical school would know way more than some measly, pathetic medical assistant on what needs to happen and who needs to be carry anything. Years before Karen testified in the Wrongful Death Trial, she stated on a facebook page:
"my first observations were on the filming of the Addam's Family video. His schedule was grueling, also going on tour. He was recovering from an attempt to correct the damage from the burn (not the burn itself). The pain of the healing nerve endings in his scalp was painful. He was administered pain killer to keep him performing. Then the child allegation began, so the pain killers also numbed his emotional pain. He became addicted.
Debbie Rowe wanted to teach me how to inject him, but I refused.
In my opinion, because of Debbie Rowe's involvement, it is probably safe to say the drugs came through Klein.
DR was obsessed with the idea of "having Michael". I refused to learn to administer the drugs, because it is NOT my place to do so. He needed qualified HELP. It is my opinion, it was more important to keep "the money train" going, than to do the right thing and let Michael heal properly. DR administering the drugs, was a way she could get his attention, and stay close to him? Is obsession sinister? Is wanting to be in Michael's company, sinister? Why do you think she offered to give him children? To be connected to him forever.
Debbie was not a licensed nurse. The divorce arrangements were a part of the marriage agreement. Debbie just wanted Michael. She thought he would fall in love with her. This broke her heart. This is why you see such unusual and mixed behavior from her.I also have said all along that Debbie was an "enabler" to Michael. I also noted that if she was still working as a nurse for Klein when she offered to have Michael's children, that she completely abused her position as a "health practitioner." It completely breaks the code of ethics that medical professionals are supposed to follow and if she was in the position of treating and administering medication to Michael she was in a "power position" it's COMPLETELY WRONG!! In most jurisdictions a health professional would be sanctioned by their professional body for crossing that line between health practitioner and patient and between professional business and personal relationships!"
* I do not want to forget this very important fact: when Michael was going through his issues with pharmaceutical drugs in 1993, he had to be admitted into a rehabilitation center. Debbie claimed in her testimony that she basically helped Michael go into rehab. As we all should know, not only was that untrue, there is no evidence that she ever helped him get into rehab. She probably suggested it, but actually help him get into rehab simply did not happen. Michael credited Elizabeth Taylor and his then wife, Lisa Marie Presley, for saving his life. I needed to point that out to let people understand how this woman likes to rewrite history.*
Michael and Debbie Saga Part 2
Which leads me to the second part of the Michael and Debbie saga and where it went horribly wrong. To be honest, their relationship was wrong from the beginning because of the way she injected herself into Michael's life. I think if another medical assistant was assigned to work with Michael, none of the nonsense would have happened to him. However, to be fair, I have no idea how Dr. Klein ran his office. We would have known how Dr. Klein ran his office but he did not testify in the trial. It is very possible that Debbie could be lying about how she came about working for Michael via Dr. Klein. Debbie stated in the trial that she was not a fan of Michael's but I have always believe that she was a fan. There is footage of Debbie's room in the apartment that she lived in that was filled with pictures of Michael. Based on that, in my opinion, I think that Debbie begged Dr. Klein to let her work with Michael. I do not care what she stated, under oath, in the case. The woman fibbed plenty of times under oath and to be honest, I do not believe she is telling the whole story about Michael and what these doctors were doing to him.
With that said, it has been made clear that Debbie was in love with Michael and when he was having troubles with his then wife, Lisa Marie, Michael told Debbie about it. That action would cost him dearly. Instead of Debbie telling Michael to go back and work it out with his wife, she decided to, once again, injected herself into things that had nothing to do with her. Remember, Michael was rich and unlike her first husband, Michael was nowhere near broke or filing for bankruptcy. Debbie knew that if she offered to give Michael children, she would be set for life. Debbie also knew that no matter how she tried to ignore it, Michael was not in love with her.
As we now know, Michael and Lisa Marie was having troubles in their marriage so Michael decides to let Debbie know about it. Michael had no intentions in wanting Debbie to have his children or marrying her. Debbie stated in a special on Michael back in 2003 that she offered to have Michael's children. Initially, Michael refused her offer and have done so many times but after reaching his limit, he gave in and decided to accept Debbie's offer. Let's remember that during that time, Debbie was working for Dr. Klein and was suppose to have a health care worker/client relationship with Michael. When he opens up to tell her his personal problems, Debbie should have listened instead of getting involved. In that process, she helped destroy a marriage, disgraced her profession and encourage Michael to think it was "ok" to have a supposed intimate relationship with a health care professional.
When Debbie was six months pregnant with Prince, she married Michael in Australia after he was done with one of his performances for the History tour. At the time that Michael and Debbie became husband and wife, there were rumors that she was pregnant. Ten days after Michael married Debbie, he confirmed that he was expecting a child. Now, how the rumors happened is a mystery. I have always believed that Debbie told the media that she was pregnant by Michael just to get the ball rolling and letting the media know that she was going to have Michael's child. Michael Jackson Jr. (Prince) was born on February 13th, 1997. (He recently turned 17. Can you believe that?)
On April 3rd, 1998, Michael became a father again when Paris Michael Katherine Jackson was born and how she got her name became more clearer after Michael passed away. See, when Paris was born, Debbie stated that her name was given because Paris, France was the place where Paris was "created". Thanks to Michael's life long friend and her socialite daughter, Kathy and Paris Hilton, not only is Debbie's story not true, it made no sense.
“My mom and Michael went to high school together and they were best friends since they were 13,” Paris explains. “So I grew up knowing Michael very well and when he had his daughter, he always loved the name Paris and grew up being an uncle to me. So he asked my mom if it was okay and of course she said yes and I think she’s such a beautiful little girl and I’m proud we have the same name.”
Finally, Michael was a father of two children and it seems like things are fine but the truth was things were weird and becoming unacceptable. I remembered when I was a teenager and I was watching the E! channel when it was stated that Debbie found out on television that Prince was sick. That startled me because I would think that Debbie was living with Michael and Prince. I started to realized that my initial suspicions about that "union" was true and that there is no possible way that Michael and Debbie were living together. As years went by, I started to look into Michael's relationship with Debbie and I was convinced that their "marriage" was a business deal to make sure that Michael became a father and that Debbie was paid millions to give Michael the children he wanted. This deal made sense to me because Michael did not love Debbie, they did not live together, he bought her a house and most importantly, she was never a mother to those children. She even stated in 2001 and 2003, that she did not want to be their mother. So, if that is the case, why in 2004, she decided that she wanted custody of Prince and Paris? Debbie divorced Michael in 1999 and Michael got full custody of his children. Now, it is very odd for a man to have full custody of his children and for a mother not have any custody of her children. Think about that for a minute. When Michael was murdered in 2009, the divorce settlement he had with Debbie was leaked. There were interesting things that were stated in the document.
“I would never do this for money,” Debbie previously told KNBC in October 1999. “I did this because I love him. That’s the only reason I did this.”I laughed when I read this quote. The irony of the quote. You can't make this up.
"Access Hollywood has uncovered Michael and Debbie’s divorce settlement filed on October 13, 1999. Debbie received a settlement of $8.5 million, an SUV and a Beverly Hills home. She got an additional $2 million for entering into a confidentiality agreement.The divorce agreement also revealed that Michael owned four properties including Neverland, a fleet of 75 vehicles including nine golf carts, two jet skis and five Rolls Royces, as well as 21 different bank accounts.
According to the settlement, Debbie was at first awarded visitation once every 45 days. The visitation had to be between the hours of 10 AM to 7 PM and supervised by a nanny. However, if Michael was “incapacitated” for longer than three weeks, Debbie was allowed to take charge of the children. She has yet to decide if she wants custody now that he has died."http://www.accesshollywood.com/divorce-papers-reveal-custody-arrangement-details-between-michael-jackson-and-debbie-rowe_article_20442
As you read that information, ask yourself, "is the fact that Michael had 21 different bank accounts and awarding Debbie millions the main reason why she continued to harass this man for his attention and not when it comes to the children?" The agreement also stated that if Michael was unable to take care of the children for more than three weeks, she can go ahead and take over. Michael has been gone, around that time, for nearly three weeks so why didn't she go ahead and take over? Keep in mind, the divorce settlement was in 1999 and a lot of things have changed since that time. When you read on, you will see why Debbie never fully went out of her way to go ahead and get custody of Prince and Paris. In 2001, during a Parental Termination Hearing, Debbie terminated all of her parental rights and wanted nothing to do with her children. Let's get into what Debbie stated in that hearing:
"Q. When is the last time you saw the children? A. I think it was either August or October of last year when I gave up my visitation rights.http://site2.mjeol.com/mj-related/damning-docs-from-debbie-rowe-parental-rights-termination-hearing.html
Q. Have you communicated with either of the children --A. No.
Q. -- Over the past year?A. Not at all.
Q. Do you wish to communicate with the children?A. No.
Q. Do you ever have the desire to call the children over the telephone?A. No.
Q. Do you have a desire to send any cards or letters to the children?A. No.
Q. Do you want the court to terminate your parental right?A. Yes
Q. Okay. A. Because --
Q. That was my next question. Why?A. Because Michael is a wonderful man, first of all, a brilliant father. And it's the best -- as their mother, it is the best interest for the children. I don't know if Judge Lachs understands this. But when I was seeing them every 45 days, it felt like an intrusion on their life and they're going to have enough intrusions as it is. I don't want to be part of it.
I'm absolutely around if ever Michael needs me, if the children need me for a liver, kidney, a hello, whatever, I will always be around for him. These are his children. I had the children for him. They wouldn't be on this planet if it wasn't for my love of him. I did it for him to become a father. Not for me to become a mother. You earn the title parent. I have done absolutely nothing to earn that title.
Q. How long have you thought about your decision?
A. Since -- I've thought about it for a year. The reason I didn't do it a year ago, everybody would have gone "UH", "Uh", "Uh", GASP, GASP, GASP. "Oh my God, have you thought this out?" So just so everybody understands, I've thought about this a lot. And this is -- this is for what's the best for the kids."
This woman has so many issues, I mean, I do not know where to begin. First of all, there is no such thing as a mother being an "intrusion" in the lives of her children. If Debbie does not want to be in the children's lives, then she should have taken the money and stop bugging Michael and the courts for custody. This is the real Debbie Rowe and this woman only cares about getting what she wanted from Michael. Debbie would be there for the children if they needed anything from her - I mean, really? The children barely know this woman so why would they need to reach out to her if they needed anything? She stated that her "love" for Michael was the reason why these children came into this world. You do not bring children in the world because you are in love with a man that does not love you back. Debbie offered to give Michael children. She did a favor for Michael and in return, she could at least see how her children were doing. I am starting to think two different things about this. 1. I am thinking that maybe Michael did not get the memo that Debbie did not want to be a mother to his children. 2. Even though I believe, for some reason, Michael wanted someone else be a mother to his children, because Debbie is their mother, he probably wanted his children to know their mother and it was their right to know. He was able to have a mother in his life and he knew how wonderful a mother's love is. He did not want his children to be robbed of that feeling and that experience. However, Debbie has no idea what it is like to give a mother's love to her own children. When you read that document, Debbie seemed very cold and evil. All of this just for some paper. Let's fast forward to 2003 when the hell started for Michael. Michael did that terrible documentary with that "journalist" Martin Bashir. The documentary was so bad that Michael wanted to do a rebuttal and he had to reach out to Debbie for a short time through Marc Scafrell in hopes that she would "defend" him. I thought that Debbie's "defense" was not necessary at all when you watched what she stated about Michael being a father. What could she state about him? She did not live with him and like she stated in the video, she gave him children because she wanted him to be a father. How did it help his case and what was the point of her being in the special? The trial that Michael went through was one of the hardest things that he has ever been through. As a fan, to watch Michael go through that ordeal was very difficult. If you thought I could not stand Debbie at that time, I loathed her even more when she started to pull her various stunts. Let's just get right to it: In 2004, Michael was going through the beginning stages of the 2005 trial. A grand jury indicted Michael with various charges of Child Molestation. That same year, Debbie did an interview with the tabloid show Entertainment Tonight to discuss with them her concerns for Prince and Paris. Also, an article from Reuters that was done by Dan Whitcomb on December 15, 2004, stated that Debbie,
"Separately, court documents made public on Wednesday showed thatThis woman was not going to stop doing what she was doing until she got whatever she wanted to get from Michael. Debbie wanted to get custody of the children because that was probably how she can get money out of it. Do not forget about this part when I get into the next part of the blog. In a court document that was filed in 2006, it gives you a better understanding as to why, after Debbie terminated her rights in 2001, why she wanted to get custody of the children.
's ex-wife has sought repeatedly over the past year to gain custody of the couple's two children, at one point invoking the molestation charges against him." Jackson
"More than two years after Deborah's motion to terminate her parental rights had been granted, she filed an ex parte application for an order to show cause seeking, among other things, temporary exclusive custody of the children pending completion of a psychiatric evaluation to assist in determining what permanent custody would be in the best interest of the children. The application stated Deborah now sought temporary custody because of concerns arising from Michael's criminal prosecution and press reports Michael had associated with the Nation of Islam, whose members Deborah believed do “not like Jews.” Because she is Jewish, Deborah feared the children might be mistreated if Michael continued his association with the Nation of Islam. Michael opposed Deborah's ex parte application in part on the ground Deborah lacked standing to request the court make any orders regarding the children because the court had previously terminated her parental rights."http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1210518.html
Sickening. In 2005, Debbie testified in the laughable Child Abuse trial in which she "defended" Michael on the stands. Fans, media and even people who were not interested in what was going on, wanted to know what Debbie had to state. Tom Sneddon and the prosecution team were expecting her to tell the jury and eventually the world what she told when she was being questioned. Tom Mesereau and the defense team had a whole binder of information that they were ready to expose to the world about her if she even think of attempting to lie on Michael. Then, Debbie decided to "tell the truth" on the stands and with that, she made sure that she got into Michael's good side. The prosecution were stunned by what she did and decided to let people know what she told them when they were questioning her. They stated that Debbie called Michael a "sociopath" and that his children were "his achilles heels" among other things. Here is more information about what she told the Santa Barbara Police Department (SBPD) Sergeant Steve Robel:
"She referred to Michael as a sociopath and his children as possessions," Sgt Robel told the court in Santa Maria, California. Sgt. Robel said that in last year's interview, Debbie Rowe told him she had agreed to "talk positive" about Michael Jackson in all public statements after their divorce in 1999. Sgt. Robel, who was called by the prosecution as it neared the conclusion of its case, said she had admitted that "those statements were false".He said Debbie Rowe told him that statements she had made in a videotape in February 2003, in which she praised Michael Jackson and his parenting skills, were not true.Correspondents say the prosecution will regard Sgt. Robel's testimony as going some way to limiting the impact of Debbie Rowe's testimony last week, when to the dismay of prosecutors who called her as a witness, she said Mr Jackson was a "great father" and "generous to a fault".
"I am aware of the arguments made by Deborahs former counsel regarding the childrens passports. It is my understanding that the State Department has declined to pursue the claims that were made on the grounds that, at the time, Michael had sole custody of the children."That was from Michael's then lawyer Michael Abrams and the State Department decline to investigate Debbie's false claims. Yeah, they probably did because they did not believe any of it.
"When Petitioners attorney announced to the Court that she had contacted the U.S. State Department to accuse Michael of child abduction and criminal fraud in obtaining passports, Michaels attorneys immediately sought to discover the accusations. Petitioner refused to produce copies of any of her accusation letters or the State Department responses. "I think that when Michael found out that this woman falsely accused him of kidnapping his own children, he was so done with her that be probably vowed that neither child of his ever get to know this woman. I will be referring to this when I get into the next part of this blog. It was also revealed that Debbie was supposed to participate in a 730 Evaluation but refused.
"The 730 Evaluation, if Petitioner had permitted it to proceed, would have provided significant evidence relevant to the custody and visitations issues which are the only issues before the Court. Petitioner has absolutely refused to participate in any way with the appointed Evaluator."http://site2.mjeol.com/mjeol-bullet/flip-flopping-rowe-gets-hands-in-jacksons-pockets-settlement-reached-mb318.html
If anyone has any doubt that Debbie never harass this man for the money with these court proceedings about custody and visitation rights, this blog post will kill the doubt. If one wants custody of their children, they will do anything in the power to make sure that they will get custody. If the courts wanted the parent to do an evaluation, that person is going to do that evaluation. Debbie clearly was not interested in doing whatever she can do to get custody of her children. All she cared about, based on the information that has been posted, is money. Of course, Michael did an 730 Evaluation because, like any reasonable parent that wants custody of their children, Michael would do anything in his power to continue to have custody of his children. As you know, the mainstream media has never been fair to Michael so whenever there is information that shows that Michael was innocent or he was a victim, the media isn't going to waste their time telling the public about it. For example, Roger Friedman is a member of the media and he has made it his mission to let the public know all of the lies that have been spewed about Michael. It seems like now Friedman is more about bashing the Jackson family and less on bashing his previous whipping boy, Michael. Even the Michael Jackson Estate executors stated that Friedman was the "go-to guy" for all things Michael. As I am typing this, I am in complete disgust over all of this. However, back in 2006, Friedman decided to tell the public about the Michael vs. Debbie custody battle but instead of telling the whole story, he tells his version of the story. In my research for this blog post, I was given a link to a blog post that single handedly ruined Friedman's credibility. First, let me post the link to the Friedman piece of the Michael vs. Debbie custody saga:
Here is the blog post that would make the reader think that not only was Friedman making up the story, but he has zero credibility:
In that blog post, it was revealed why Debbie really testified in the 2005 trial (read the underline part) -
"Who has Michael been disloyal to? Schaffel who plundered Michael's accounts for himself and tried to rob Michael of his land during the trial? Debbie who worked with Sneddon to harm her own ex-husband? Or the many extortionists who work with low-life racists like Roger when they have been found out as no-gooders around Michael? So Debbie is supposed to breach an agreement and Michael should sit back and do nothing about it? So what was the point of the agreement in the first place? Get a life Roger."With all of the information that is stated on this blog post, it boggles the mind that there are people out there who do not seem to care what this woman did to Michael. In 2008, Debbie did an interview with the tabloid, Daily Mail and in the article, she talks about being a "mother" among other things. I am not going to waste any time on this article because I am so disgusted by this woman. However, I will post this quote she stated which sums up who she truly is:
"Pictures of her beloved 'babies' cover the yellowing walls of Debbie Rowe's remote home. There are favourite snapshots, framed portraits and even paintings which perfectly capture their expressions of innocence.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-513206/My-life-mother-Michael-Jacksons-children-Debbie-Rowe.html
Rowe studies the faces looking down at her and says fiercely: "I am possessive and protective of my babies. Their happiness means more to me than anything else on this world. I love them more than I would ever have thought was possible."
It is, one might think, perfectly normal for a mother to feel this way about her children. But the portraits adorning Rowe's walls show her menagerie of animals - not the two children she produced with, and then handed over to, Michael Jackson."
Yep. Her smelly animals were more of her children than her own human children. Disgusting. When Michael was murdered in 2009, of course, talked turn to custody of Michael's children. The 2002 will was revealed and it stated that Katherine was the guardian of the children. (That has now changed to Katherine and Michael's nephew, Tito's son, TJ Jackson, as guardians of Michael's children.) It did not take the tabloid media long when they wanted to know if Debbie will want to get custody of the children. Let's start with a transcript of a segment from the HLN (Headline News) show ShowBiz Tonight did on Debbie supposedly trying to get custody of Prince and Paris:
"HAMMER: Let's move on to another big bombshell that's making big news right now. Debbie Rowe possibly fighting for custody of the two kids that she had with Michael Jackson. Everybody's wondering if this was going to happen. Well, first, she told KNBC TV's Chuck Henry in a telephone interview that she will fight for custody. Watch this. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) CHUCK HENRY, KNBC TV ANCHOR: She made it perfectly clear that she wants the children. She said, "You know, Michael and I had an agreement. But he broke the agreement. He died." (END VIDEO CLIP) HAMMER: Well, Debbie Rowe's attorney confirms that Rowe said that she will fight for the kids. But on the other hand, in a telephone news conference, he also said Debbie hasn't made up her mind yet. Listen to this. (BEGIN AUDIO CLIP) ERIC GEORGE, ATTORNEY FOR DEBBIE ROWE (through telephone): I have no reason to doubt that what was reported from that conversation was accurately and ethically reported. But that said, it would be a distortion of the truth to allow that single snapshot of a single conversation to stand as the truth of Debbie's sense on these sensitive matters. So once again, the truth is that Debbie has not reached a final decision concerning the pending custody proceedings. (END AUDIO CLIP) HAMMER: It's having an impact, because after Rowe's comments, the judge did delay a custody hearing that was set for Monday to decide if Michael Jackson's mother, Katherine, will, in fact, remain the temporary guardian of the kids. Jean, back to you on this. If Debbie Rowe does decide to go for this, what do you think? Does she have a chance? CASAREZ: Oh, she definitely has a chance because she still retains her parental rights. It's so fascinating - there's a little bit of history. She filed a motion to voluntarily give up her parental rights. In 2004, it was found that because the children didn't have an attorney to determine what was in their best interest, she actually retained them. So that is why she now has a right to go forward, and I think she probably will. HAMMER: And when you are the birth mother, from everything I've come to understand, Jean, in California, you`re first in line. CASAREZ: That is true. If you don't have parental rights anymore, however, if you have given them up, then that's a different story. So I think the critical issue is she still has them. HAMMER: Well, in our SHOWBIZ TONIGHT question of the day, our viewers are sounding off. We're asking on air and online, Michael Jackson's kids, should Debbie Rowe get custody? Carlos, a lot of people have been writing to us and saying, absolutely not. Katherine Jackson is the woman who the kids are closest with. She's been a big part of their lives and she was very close with Michael. What's your gut on this? Do you think she is going to make a run for custody of those kids? DIAZ: Why shouldn't she? From a very negative standpoint, she can get some money out of it - hush money, if you will, you know, if the family wants her just to go away. I mean, she got that from Michael to begin with. But let me make one point perfectly clear, if the kids go to Debbie Rowe, they will be split up because Prince Michael I and Paris will go to Debbie Rowe, and then Blanket will stay with Katherine. And you've got to worry about the mystery mom coming out of the woodwork for that one. But if you think Debbie Rowe should get the kids, then you`re in favor of splitting up the three kids. HAMMER: Yes, which should be just so completely unfortunate. Jean Casarez, do you have a gut on this? I know you've seen lots of custody cases before - nothing quite like this. Do you think she'll make a run for it? CASAREZ: Well, I think, you know, she very well may, because I believe her attorney was going to be at the hearing, so that shows an intent right there. But if you look at the Court of Appeals' decision how she gave up her parental rights. There was no visitation. She said she wanted to have nothing to do with the children because Michael was such a good father, that's going to be considered by the court."
Let's say that Debbie does get custody of Prince and Paris - that would have been devastating to Blanket who would barely see his older siblings. Only a wicked person would not think about the bigger picture and the aftermath. In another article, it was mentioned that a former friend of Debbie's stated that she was an unfit mother. You can read the article here:
Damning statements from Debbie's former friend and it could be true because after all of the information that is posted on this blog, she is completely unstable. Heck, she did not even participated in a 730 Evaluation in order for her to see if she can get custody of her children. From that time in 2009 up until this time in 2013, Debbie probably saw Prince and Paris at least once. However, nothing could have prepared me or anyone else that has an issue with Debbie around these children for what was yet to come. This is what made me think twice about Katherine and if anyone in the Jacksons even has a clue about the hell that Debbie put Michael through.
Debbie and Paris
"Paris Jackson has chosen to move out of the home she shares with her guardian and grandmother Katherine Jackson and move in with her birth mother Debbie Rowe.According to Jackson sources, over the last six weeks, the pair have been bonding, with Paris spending her 15th birthday with Debbie in April rather than 84-year-old Katherine and the rest of the Jackson family.Whenever you read an article that cites "sources" take it with a grain of salt, even if they could be telling the truth. With that said, Paris wants to live with her mother because her grandmother's beliefs are not her beliefs? Ok, isn't Paris a Christian? Yes. Isn't her grandmother technically a Christian? Yes. So, how is her beliefs extremely old fashion? Maybe Paris does not agree with a lot of things her grandmother believes in. That does not equate that she wants to "live with her mother".
Our insider explained: “Whilst she loves her grandmother Katherine, Paris thinks she has some extremely old-fashioned beliefs."
“It’s been very tough living under their roof and whilst her brothers also feel the same way, it’s Paris who’s recently taken the lead in standing up for her beliefs and defying her grandmother."Now, this is hard to believe. Her brothers don't feel the same way. They have no issue with their family. Blanket has a different mother so I have no idea why he was even included in this. Prince made it clear who side he is on and I will explain that later. Why would Paris defy the same woman she was worried about back in 2012 and having a whole fit on twitter about her whereabouts? (As rightfully she should.) As for this "normal upbringing" nonsense that the media loves to inject when it comes to Michael's children, Paris will never have a normal life. She is the daughter of the greatest entertainer that ever lived. If she wanted a normal upbringing, then she should have been born into a different family. Debbie will never give her that type or normalcy because she does not want that for herself.
Our source also explains that for the first time, Paris feels that under Debbie's supervision she could have a normal upbringing."
“Paris loves the fact that when she’s out with Debbie, there aren't any security or bodyguards around them," says the source."Please. And the paparazzi aren't a problem? A child of Michael's needs security.
"It's not the first sign of tensions within the Jackson family, with reports earlier this month stating that Paris has refused to accept her grandmother's strict Jehovah Witness beliefs."
There are tensions in every family. Why would the Jacksons be any different? Because there are tensions in the family, Paris wants to live with her mother??? As for Paris refusing to accept her grandmother's beliefs, she is 15 years old and they do not have a say. When she is grown, pays her bills and have a job, then she can have a say. When I read the rest of the article, I cannot help but wonder if this was a conversation that Paris probably have with Debbie. Something tells me that Debbie was probably the source to that article because Debbie has a history of being sources to various articles when it comes to her time with Michael. Around this time, Debbie joins facebook and twitter and posts pictures of her "bonding time" with a daughter that she never wanted to raise. Around this time, Debbie's niece, Jesse, tweeted to Harvey Levin of TMZ.com pictures of her and Paris. Like I stated earlier, Debbie has friends over at tmz.com. She stated that she has been friends with Harvey Levin for 25 years. I cannot make this up. I posted a screen capture of the tweets on an previous blog post. I want to post the tweets again to show you want she wanted Harvey to do:
" Jessejes @JesseeeJess 3h@HarveyLevinTMZ pls contact me if you are going to use the pics per my aunt lolhttp://jacksonpresleyworld.freeforums.org/debbie-rowe-t683-30.html
Jessejes @JesseeeJess 3h@HarveyLevinTMZ there are pics already buy not these
Jessejes @JesseeeJess 3h@HarveyLevinTMZ no one has this me and my cuz Paris #familytime #love pic.twitter.com/hHP4im3Wid
Jessejes @JesseeeJess 3hMy aunt said to tweet this to you @HarveyLevinTMZ me and my cuz Paris #familytime"
Isn't that disgusting? I am convinced that Debbie was having a plan to get Paris and exploit her to the media on her own terms for some kind of benefit. What benefit would she want from Paris? Could it have something to do with money? Remember how she used her "charm" to get her first husband and divorced him soon as he filed for bankruptcy? Debbie used her same "charms" to get to Michael. She earned his trust and did what she had to do to get what she wanted from Michael. Now, with her daughter, Paris, she has probably used her "charms" to get what she wants from Paris. It seemed like everytime Debbie would exploit or pimp Paris to the media, there was a new tabloid story about Paris wanting to part ways with her family. I wonder why Debbie seems to want this to happen? Why would she want her daughter to be put out there in a exploitative type of fashion? Then, in June, Paris attempted suicide. My sister sent me a text about Paris and I did not read it because why would my sister send me a text about someone's kid? Then I read the text and I was mortified with the news. I decided not to follow the tabloid media's take and tried to ignore it. I even refuse to comment about it on my blog because I felt that discussing this subject on here was not something I would do. When doing this entry, I have been thinking of posting my theory of what I think happened. I will not do that because I don't know what really happened and deep down, what was reported on what happened to Paris I do not fully believe. I do believe that Debbie did notify the media, particularity her friends over at tmz.com of Paris' attempt. I mean, just by that information, this whole thing can write itself and I am not going to go any further than that. I can tell you what really angered me was when Jermaine was asked by tmz.com about his niece issues and just watch the video for yourself.
"Viviαηα #Aηimαlistα @VivianaBsAs 5h.Hi Debbie! Plz, how can the fans ask Harvey to stop this filthy news in tmz about MJ? thanks @DJRJPDRPainted Desert Ranch Painted Desert Ranch @DJRJPDR@VivianaBsAs the news tmz reports is the real news it day the same things in the LA Times"http://jacksonpresleyworld.freeforums.org/debbie-rowe-t683-80.html
I do not care who the fan is or what she believes in. When it comes to the truth about Debbie Rowe, I am all eyes and ears. Debbie was foul in those series of tweets. I will probably do a blog post all about how wrong this woman is about the women in his life. Debbie bashing the black women in his life shows how out of touch she is with reality. Michael has a black mother, aunts, female cousins, sisters, nieces and a daughter. What kind of woman, who claims to be educated, would even go there with black women? Instead of accepting her reality, she bashes what she cannot even understand. For anyone that was wondering what was Prince's relationship with Debbie, read what was revealed in the Wrongful Death Case about Prince's relationship with his mother:
"Mr. Boyle: The problem is Ms. Debbie Rowe is not the mother, so the instructions should be you heard counsel say Debbie Rowe is the mother, Debbie Rowe is not the mother.Judge: Well, the witness came out with that.Mr. Panish: No, but she said their mother, Debbie Rowe.Ms. Chang: The children's mother, Debbie Rowe.Ms. Cahan: I said Prince and Paris.Ms. Chang: But he has no relationship with her. He rejects her Ms. Chang: ….. They've traveled so much. Blanket was seven. They had been traveling in the middle east for at least three years, and he didn't know his aunts or uncles or cousins, and so it was worse, and they had absolutely no relationship with their biological mother. So everything that he said was true; and now we have this situation where the jury is given the false impression that these kids have a biological mother, and that she's reconnected with them. Totally untrue. Prince has not seen and will not see her."
http://www.scribd.com/doc/153820592/Jackson-V-AEG-Live-July-11th-2013-Transcripts-of-Taj-Jackson (pages 77-79)
At least the son clearly sees Debbie's true ways. In October, Debbie did an exclusive interview with another one of her media friends, Entertainment Tonight. Keep in mind these things: Debbie is friends with certain employees of the tabloid and ET pays for interviews. I did not watch the interview because I wanted to avoid it at all costs. There was nothing that she could state that would make me believe that she is a genuinely a good person. However, I did read about what she stated and the things that she stated were so pathetic that I can't even be bothered with them. One thing in particular was when she stated that she blamed everyone who worked in the This Is It rehearsals for Michael's death. Let's see, did any of those people poisoned Michael with drugs? Did those people became possessive with Michael so he would not leave their sight? Did they implied that Michael harmed his own children? Did they call Michael a sociopath? Did they bring drugs into a bag and asked his make up artist to inject drugs into Michael's system? I mean, I can go on and on with how ridiculous Debbie's lame comment was. It is clear that she does not get it.
Why Do Others Get Bashed but Debbie Doesn't?
Let's start with the first link - the blogger believes that Michael was gay so he/she does not believe that Michael even liked Tatiana. The blogger also believes what Jason Pfeffer, Dr. Klien's former employee, stated about Michael. It is clear, the blogger is clueless in all things Michael. Instead of dwelling on this woman, why didn't the blogger talked about Debbie and all of the terrible things she did and stated about Michael? The second blog was very well written but if you read closely, the blogger wanted to brand Tatiana a liar because of a few inconsistencies in her interviews over the years. Wouldn't it be very smart for that blogger to put that same effort into what Debbie did to Michael over the years? Case in point, how Debbie made sure to bother Michael with the custody nonsense. The third blog dwells on the "lies" that Tatiana stated over the years. Anyone can see that this fan was jealous of the woman and maybe could not accept the fact that Michael actually liked the woman. I wished that the fan would focused more about the lies of Debbie Rowe instead of Tatiana's supposed lies. That way, the blogger would have been taken seriously. Theresa Gonsalves came forward back in the 1980s to talk to the Globe tabloid about the classic song "Billie Jean" being about her. If you read her book about her time with Michael, you will know why she went to the tabloids in the first place. Of course, there will always be fans that would dwell on things that have nothing to do with her credibility but completely ignore what Debbie did to Michael. Case in point, this blog post:
If you read carefully, the blogger states that they cannot state much about her but yet, do a blog post that questions her credibility. What about doing a blog post on how Debbie falsely accused Michael of kidnapping his own children? We cannot forget about Lisa Marie Presley, one of the true loves of Michael's life and his one and only wife. When Lisa Marie came forward in 2003 to Rolling Stone magazine about her time with Michael, the fan community had a fit. Why? Well, Lisa Marie was stating things that the fans did not want to hear. Yes, she stated things that I did not like and I was furious over and I can never forget that interview she and her evil looking mother, Priscilla, did with Oprah back in 2005. However, after all of the nonsense, Lisa Marie, after Michael died, wrote a moving and touching tribute to Michael. She did not have to do that at all but she did. Lisa Marie did an interview with Oprah talking about Michael and yes, I was a bit eh with the interview, but she never treated Michael like trash. Michael and Lisa Marie had a typical relationship like any couple would have. The loved, argued, fought, broke up, gotten back together and ended their relationship. Who hasn't been through that with their loved one? However, when it comes to Debbie, can she state that she went through all of that with Michael? Can Debbie state how Michael would tell his mother how much he loved her? Can she state to anyone that Michael loved her body? Can she state to you all that Michael was their first time and it was love? No, she can't. Yet, she can tell you how "reliable" tmz.com are. You can read some of the comments fans stated about Lisa Marie on these links:
As I was doing my searching, I saw a blog post that truly proved to me that the MJ fan community really do not get it. I want you all to read this blog post:
Now, keep in mind, I and that blogger read the same transcripts of Debbie's testimony and instead of telling the reader why that this woman was not supposed to inject collagen or that she wanted Karen to inject drugs into Michael's system when she was not even in the medical profession to do so, the blogger focuses on things that means nothing because none of the things Debbie did for Michael worked. This blogger also forgot to mentioned that Debbie was unprofessional, obsessed with Michael and gave Michael a lot of problems when the second allegations of child abuse happened. So much for "Vindicating Michael"; it is more like ignoring the damn truth.
When doing the research for this entry, I felt even more bad for Michael and his children he had with Debbie. I know various people would ask themselves, "what was Michael thinking" when he associated himself with this woman but the answer to that question is he was not thinking and was more drugged up than lucid. I believe that Michael had a bad rap when to came to the doctors that came into his life and the nonsense that followed it. I do not want to discuss about these doctors that Michael had because this entry is not about them. This entry is about the truth about certain people in this world called opportunists. Debbie was an opportunist and instead of not injecting herself in Michael's personal like and health care, she did it anyway. Why would a medical assistant allow a client to tell them what to do with their health? A medical assistant is not educated in medicine to even remotely give a client any advice. The sad reality is that people like Debbie get away with so many things because this country was built for her to do these things and get away with it. How can anyone report this woman to the medical board? This woman left the medical world right after she became pregnant with Prince. How can the courts make it stick in regards to her terminating her parental rights? Well, because she is the birth mother, she will have her parental rights. How can we get a lost child away from the very person that will ruin her entire life? We have to pray that Paris wakes up and take charge in her life. We have to pray for Prince to have the strength to save his sister from that woman. People will want to know why I care so much about something that does not concern me. I tell them that I care because I do not want Michael to be known as a man who allowed some loser throw away his manhood. I care because I do not want people to think that Michael was stupid to allow that woman take so much from him. I want people to know that Michael fought to make sure his children do not have to deal with her. Michael fought for what was rightfully his and thought that everything was fine until he died. Instead of looking into what this woman did to him, his family and most of his fans did not seem to care. I hope that this blog post gets people thinking and if someone can learn from one of Michael's biggest mistakes, then I did what I had to do. This is Michael's side of the story and it needs to be told because who will tell it? The media who will side with Debbie in a heartbeat? Or, the fans - most of them refuses to see anything wrong with her and will find a million excuses that has nothing to do with what she actually did and stated to/about the man? Michael's side has now been told and there is nothing anyone can do about it.
Articles/Blog Posts/Court Documents/Websites -
Debbie Rowe being profiled in People in 1996- http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20142911,00.html
Debbie's interview with the UK tabloid Daily Mail -
Debbie's ignorant comments towards black women and Michael -
A rundown of Debbie's testimony -
Debbie's friend state she is a unfit mother - http://www.celebitchy.com/61864/debbie_rowes_friend_says_shes_a_boozer_and_starts_drinking_at_11/
Karen Faye's testimony -
An article about Insomnia treatments -
Blog posts on Tatiana Thumbtzen -
Blog post on Theresa Gonsalves -
Blogs/comments on Lisa Marie Presley -
Information about medical assistants, complaints from the Medical Board of California's website -
Roger Friedman's Article full of fables -
The amazing rebuttal to Roger Friedman's nonsense -
Paris wants to live with Debbie -
Debbie Rowe's Testimony Part 1 -
Part 2 -
Court of Appeal in regards to the Custody Issue with Michael and Debbie Rowe -
Michael Jackson Jr. wants nothing to do with Debbie -
The Custody issue -
Richard Elderman's quote after Debbie Rowe divorced him from the UK tabloid, The Mirror
Paris Hilton's Quote about Paris Jackson being her namesake from the TV show Extra, July 2009.
Karen Faye's comments on facebook came from her facebook account.
Twitter - Debbie Rowe's niece tweets to Harvey Levin -
Debbie's defense over the credibility of tmz.com -
Most of the videos came from youtube.com.
Came from a google.com search.
* A special thank you to Asia, Baby (from LSA, lipstickalley.com) for their help.